The Equalizer
Neither McCall or The Equalizer say very much about our nasty zeitgeist. But all things being equal, there are worse ways to spend a trip to the movie theater … or The Home Depot.
Movie Reviews and More
Grade: B
Director: Tony Scott
Starring: Denzel Washington, Chris Pine, Rosario Dawson, Kevin Dunn, Kevin Corrigan, and Lew Temple
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Running Time: 1 hour, 38 minutes
With a thundering sound mix drowned out only by the den of apposite popcorn-munching throughout the theater, Unstoppable is the quintessential example of a film that doesn’t try to be anything more than it is. An unmanned, half-mile-long freight train carrying thousands of gallons of hazardous phenol acid barrels through the Western Pennsylvania countryside at 70 mph, its destination the densely populated city of
Loosely based on the 2001 “Crazy Eights” unmanned train incident in Ohio, Director Tony Scott amplifies his typical camera-in-a-blender action sequences with depictions of frenzied media coverage – including swooping news choppers, filmed using other unseen choppers – and dubious corporate agendas being foiled by hardnosed track manager Connie Hooper (Rosario Dawson). And, Barnes and Colston are provided just enough back-story while riding the rails to feign character development.
Mostly, however, this is prototypical white-knuckle intensity that is slickly produced and – notwithstanding the pseudo-elephant trumpet that blares every time the runaway train rolls by – more reserved than Scott and Washington’s more recent collaborations, Man on Fire, Deja Vu, and The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3. Unstoppable fits the criteria of the sort of movie Max Cherry said he wanted to see in Jackie Brown: something that starts soon and looks good.
Neil Morris
Rail Rage
Grade: C
Director: Tony Scott
Starring: Denzel Washington, John Travolta, James Gandolfini, Luis Guzman, and John Turturro
MPAA Rating: R
Running Time: 1 hour, 46 minutes
Tony Scott is like the Rafael Palmeiro of filmmaking. Both were mid-to-upper standouts in their respective fields until avarice and self-indulgence persuaded them to artificially – and detrimentally – enhance their innate abilities. For Palmeiro, it was taking steroids for more hits and homers. For Scott, it is the audio-visual gimcracks he has allowed to infect his films the past decade: The jump-cuts, the slow motion, the freeze frames, the oversaturated color schemes, the time-lapse photography, the clanging, hip-hop-lite soundtracks by Harry Gregson-Williams. Its false bravado masquerading as cocksure preening, with little but car crashes and actors yelling at the camera to approximate the illusion of narrative drive.
You will quickly realize it is business as usual in Scott’s remake of The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 when you hear the openings strains of Jay-Z’s “99 Problems,” a six-year-old rap song with no apparent contextual connection to the film. In between herky-jerky images of the New York City skyline and subway system, we glimpse the blurry apparition of Ryder (John Travolta), a tattooed, racist ex-commodities trader making his way underground where he will lead the hijacking of the 6 train from Pelham Bay Park.
Denzel Washington (appearing in his fourth collaboration with Scott) plays MTA dispatcher Walter Garber, presumably named in part after Walter Matthau, who played then-Lt. Zachery Garber in director Joseph Sargent’s fondly held 1974 film adaptation of John Godey’s source novel. Garber finds himself in the unfortunate position of ad hoc negotiator with Ryder, who demands $10 million in an hour or he will execute one hostage for every tardy minute.
The miscast Travolta never firmly establishes Ryder’s persona: One minute he is a shrewd, diabolical nemesis, the next a ranting, raving lunatic unraveling under the pressure of his hair-brained scheme. Every time the high-pitched Travolta shrieks one of his many MF-bombs, he sounds as if he’s reading them off cue cards.
The stolid screenwriting combo of David Koepp and Brian Helgeland meekly attempt to introduce some moral ambiguity into Garber’s character, a device that worked well when applied to Nick Nolte’s protagonist in Martin Scorsese’s Cape Fear remake. But, Garber’s “confession” that he once accepted a work-related bribe comes only under Ryder’s threat to shoot a hostage if Garber doesn’t come clean. If that’s not sanitized enough for you, he also reveals that he spent the bribe money on his kids’ college tuition.
Initial police suspicion that Garber might be working in cahoots with Ryder is an intriguing angle that would have added another dimension to the procedural plotline, but it dissipates without comment as quickly as it materializes. So, too, with the discovery that Ryder’s true financial target is not cash but rather stock market manipulation: The last time we hear anything about that is when the city’s mayor (James Gandolfini) announces he is marching down to the SEC to look into any of Ryder’s recent, suspicious transactions. Just a suggestion, I’d say all of them.
The film’s banality reaches its nadir when Scott rolls out the most anticlimactic ending this side of brother Ridley’s American Gangster. Let’s just say a crime rooted in intricate planning and cunning execution comes down to one guy walking across an overpass getting caught by another guy running across an overpass. If that sounds exciting, then boy, do I have a bridge to sell you.
Neil Morris
Although officially helmed by Ridley Scott, American Gangster plays like the Antoine Fuqua-directed version that never got past pre-production: solid but stolid, honest but derivative, and involving yet indolent. In essence, it is a portrait of contrasts, not merely between its two protagonists but the two halves matted together to create a watchable but unoriginal whole.
It is not just that Denzel Washington channels his ablest incarnation yet of the Training Day/Malcolm X amalgam he regularly regurgitates nowadays, or that Russell Crowe’s Serpico-redux turns in $1 million in found drug money rather than share it with cops-on-the-take who consequently turn against him. The real plagiarism is a story arc that mimics everything from Scarface to Superfly to The Godfather without injecting any artistry or dramatic tension.
The by-the-numbers script from writer Steven Zaillian vacillates between Lucas and Roberts using parallel storylines. The ironic plot hook, we quickly learn, is that Lucas is a ruthless criminal who loves and cares for his family – most of whom he moves from
The basic problems are two-fold. First, this is fundamentally Frank Lucas’ story, and every minute spent focused on Roberts’ backstory feels like filler, however compelling it might be unto itself. Second is the derivative quality of the Lucas treatment: so little time is devoted or usefully spent on Lucas that we are only left with the bare prerequisites of a docudrama about a Harlem Scarface or Godfather – a violent outburst here, an attempt on his life there, etc. Nary an eyebrow is raised inside or out of Lucas’ inner-circle when he beds and weds a Puerto Rican Beauty Queen during the early 1970s, while the talent of Chewitel Ejiofor is squandered in an underdeveloped role as one of Frank’s younger brothers.
When the narrative orbits of Lucas and Roberts finally intersect, the result is a glossy, almost giddy final act that is tonally out of sync with the rest of the film. In a moment that should wallow in Lucas’ comeuppance, Scott attempts to elevate him to the status of folk hero.
Although generally entertaining, there is a perfunctory, workmanlike air hovering around American Gangster that keeps it from attaining the lofty designs it clearly desires. Then again, the last movie costarring both Denzel and Crowe was Virtuosity, so at least this is an improvement.
Neil Morris