Showing posts with label domhnall gleeson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label domhnall gleeson. Show all posts

December 25, 2014

Unbroken

I'm a Stare Contest Olympian, too

Unbroken
Grade: C +
Director: Angelina Jolie
Starring: Jack O’Connell, Garrett Hedlund, Domhnall Gleeson, Takamasa Ishihara and Finn Wittrock
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Running Time 2 hr. 17 min.

The extraordinary true story at the heart of Unbroken, one that “must be told” according to the film’s ad slogan, is both its highest virtue and the albatross around its neck. The incredible life and times of Louis Zamperini (portrayed by Irish actor Jack O’Connell) is the sort of saga you couldn’t make into a movie unless it was bulwarked by truth. On the other hand, director Angelina Jolie hoists a hagiography that carefully traverses its phenomenal protagonist's Job-like tribulations, stepping lightly as if through a field of poppies it doesn’t want to tousle.

Popularized in a 2010 biography by author Laura Hillebrand, Zamperini’s odyssey begins with competing in the 5000-meter race in the 1936 Berlin Olympics, where he places eighth but runs a blistering 56-second final lap. Following a linear line that the film eschews, Zamperini then joines the Army and, in 1942, survives being adrift for 47 days on a raft in the Pacific Ocean after his faulty B-24 crashed, killing eight of the 11 men aboard.

Barely subsisting off a diet of raw fish and rainwater, Zamperini fellow survivor Phil Phillips (Domhnall Gleeson) are eventually rescued/captured by the Japanese Navy. They are tortured for military information, and Zamperini is eventually transferred to a POW camp, where he spends two years being subjected to the sadistic whims of Mutsuhiro Watanabe (Miyavi, the Japanese pop star). Nicknamed “the Bird,” Watanabe uses his kendo stick to routinely beat Zamperini, and orders the weakened American to race Japanese guards for his amusement. After Zamperini refuses to become a radio turncoat for Japan, Watanabe lines up every prisoner in the camp and orders them to punch Zamperini in his face.

Zamperini’s courage is undeniable, and learning his remarkable story alone justifies seeing Unbroken. However, a visit to Wikipedia accomplishes the same goal, rendering Jolie’s biopic unwieldy and safe. The script is littered with easily recyclable platitudes like, “A moment of pain is worth a lifetime of glory,” and “If I can take it, I can make it,” which becomes the film’s anthem. The narrative is punctuated with flashbacks, most to Zamperini’s childhood in Torrence, Calif., where his Italian-American family’s experience with prejudice purportedly informed his steely resolve and forgiving disposition.

As if sensing the Oscar potential at play, Jolie concocts a esteemable stew of contributors—Roger Deakins’ provides the cinematography, William Goldenberg edits, the Coen brothers polish the script, Alexandre Desplat composes the ponderous score—whose prestigious yet disparate parts never coalesce into a cohesive whole.

Jolie deserves credit for acknowledging the role faith played in Zamperini’s survival (at one point promising to dedicate his life to God if he survives being lost at sea, a vow he eventually kept), But the director succumbs to turning her subject into a Christ-like figure, notably some heavy-handed Passion symbolism when Zamperini is forced to lift and hold a heavy wooden beam over his head for hours. Similarly, Jolie treats Zamperini and his fellow POWs—headlined by Garrett Hedlund—as a deified band of brothers, disciples devoid of any duplicity or hard edges; the closest we get is a glimpse of some GI Judases enjoying the good life in exchange for cooperating with Japanese propagandists.

Zamperini’s story is indeed one that must be told.  Unfortunately, Unbroken turns out to be a glossy echo chamber.

December 16, 2012

Anna Karenina

The same number of viewers are
watching this in actual movie theaters


Grade: B -
Director: Joe Wright
Starring: Keira Knightley, Jude Law, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Matthew MacFayden, Domhnall Gleeson and Alicia Vikander
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Running Time: 2 hr. 10 min.

If they handed out awards for pouty lips and come hither stares, Keira Knightley would be the Katherine Hepburn of our generation. As it stands, she’s a talented and, yes, alluring actress who always seems to be in the mix come movie awards season but, to date, only has one Oscar nomination to her credit, for 2005’s Pride & Prejudice. [She is a two-time winner of the Teen Choice Award for “Movie Liplock,” so there’s that.]

It’s little wonder, then, that Knightley has re-teamed with her P&P director Joe Wright twice since, first in the bloated Atonement and now the umpteenth adaptation of Anna Karenina. Their rendering of Leo Tolstoy’s classic novel is opulent and earnest, an eager production that’s more busy than bold. And while there’s much to admire about Wright’s aesthetic, you probably won’t remember what they were a half-hour later.

In adapting Tolstoy’s tale of romance, (in)fidelity and society set in swinging 1870s St. Petersburg, Wright situates the action within the tableau of a stage production, albeit one with a broad conception of space. Scene transitions pass between pulleys curtains and lighting rigs; actors are situated in front of flood lights; some outdoor scenes are conceived with painterly landscapes. It’s a conceit that’s initially off-putting, but gradually the staging devices become an object for artistic admiration, such as a horse race that appears to run from stage right to left and an exquisite ballroom dance scene as Anna (Knightley) and her illicit lover Count Vronsky (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) twirl amongst a crowd of onlookers literally frozen in time.

However, Anna Karenina is a story built on passion, which is something that frequently gets lost amongst the cinematic atmospherics. The literary Anna is a victim of cultural mores and desire so unbridled she allows it to compromise her marriage and social standing. While Wright and Knightley effectively convey that reckless abandon, what’s missing is any apprehension for its provenance. Anna simply swoons breathlessly for Vronsky, whom Taylor-Johnson misplays as a preening scalawag who is not dashing nor all that desirable. Moreover, we simply asked to assume the reasons Anna has no love left for her older husband Karenin, well-played with slow-burn restraint by Jude Law. Part of the disconnect is a matter of age: Karenin is 20 years Anna’s senior in Tolstoy’s story while Law is only 12 years older than Knightley. Most of it, however, is a matter of perception. Vronsky does little beyond garble a few sweet nothings to make Anna so blindingly betray her marital and maternal vows.

Thus, so much of the 130-minute running time plays out like overcooked melodrama: think Douglas Sirk meets Max Ophüls meets Baz Luhrmann. That makes for good spectacle, but not necessarily compelling cinema.